Directory › Contractor Foreman

Research file · 2026-08-31

Contractor Foreman

A broad contractor-management platform with one of the deepest independently visible review footprints in this group.

https://contractorforeman.com/

This file records what was documented in reviewed public sources on 2026-08-31. It is not a security certification, a legal opinion, or a recommendation. Where something is marked not verified, it means we looked and did not find it publicly — not that it is absent or deficient.

The public record

Location
Forest City, North Carolina, United States
Legal entity
Construction Contractor Services, LLC
History
2017
Category
Construction and contractor management
Phone
(828) 375-8042
Support
Email, live chat, knowledge base, training, and a stated global team

Publicly identified principals

  • Steven Gabbard Founder & CEO

    Official and public-profile material describes more than 30 years in construction and founding Construction Contractor Services.

    Source
  • Marcus Hantla COO

    Public profile describes SaaS operations and scale experience.

    Source

Public operating signals

Official LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram accounts were active in the sampled period. LinkedIn posted roughly two to three times weekly; Facebook was frequent; content focused on construction education, product updates, and trade-business tips. Engagement was primarily reactions, with some substantive LinkedIn comments.

Source

Pricing, contract, security & exit

Pricing
Starts at $49/month; package and annual-plan conditions apply
Contract
Conditional 100-day money-back guarantee for specified annual plans; cancellation through subscription settings
Security
Vendor materials describe AWS hosting, encryption, and security audits. No independent SOC 2 or ISO certification was located.
Data exit
Selected CSV and Excel exports are documented. Complete account export and a fixed post-termination retrieval period were not verified.

Third-party assurance

Vendor security controls documented

No matching public CSA STAR, TrustPartners, or major trust-center listing was located. Vendor privacy material describes security protocols, encryption, and security audits without a directly verifiable independent artifact.

Source

Documented capabilities

  • GPS/geolocated time cards, daily logs, crews, and subcontractor workflows
  • Estimates, e-signatures, job costing, photos, tasks, and training
  • iOS and Android use

Documented integrations

  • QuickBooks Online and Desktop two-way sync
  • CompanyCam, Gusto, Microsoft Project, and Zapier

Looked for, not found in public sources

  • Full offline data entry and sync behavior for every field workflow

These are gaps in the public record. Ask the vendor directly; several may well exist without being publicly documented.

Score breakdown

Operational fit Field work, sales, estimating, and automation
22/22
Integration & data sync Accounting, ecosystem connections, and API evidence
14/14
Adoption & mobile Field-team usability, onboarding, and offline evidence
13/14
Support & reliability Reachability, published support, and operating evidence
11/14
Commercial clarity Public pricing, billing model, trial, cancellation, and renewal terms
10/10
Security, privacy & exit Third-party assurance evidence, privacy governance, and practical data exit
6/18
Company transparency Named principals, sustained operating communication, and review context
7/8
Public-Evidence Fit & Exit Score
83/100

How each dimension is scored ↗

Independent review signals

Reviews repeatedly point to value, broad coverage, and support. Learning curve, lag, and setup complexity appear in some feedback.

Ratings belong to the platforms shown and were read on 2026-08-31. We do not host reviews, and we never convert review sentiment into a security or exit-readiness claim.

What to ask before you sign

  • Request full retention and post-termination export terms in writing.
  • Test offline workflow and QuickBooks setup with real job data.
  • Read the conditions attached to the 100-day guarantee before relying on it.

Source trail

Class A: legal, regulatory, product, or registry material. Class B: vendor-published support or product material. Class C: independent review platform or community source.

Something here out of date or wrong? Request a correction ↗